Skip to content
GAIAA, Intelligence, engineered
Solutions
Solutions overviewBuild, deploy and improve AI systems that deliver real value.Private AI infrastructureRun private AI securely in your infrastructure.Existing AI optimizationMake existing AI faster, more reliable and more valuable.
Main specializations
Computer VisionSmart CityLIMSIndustrial IoT
IndustriesCase StudiesAbout usBlogContact
ENPL
Solutions
Solutions overviewPrivate AI infrastructureExisting AI optimization
Main specializations
Computer VisionSmart CityLIMSIndustrial IoT
IndustriesCase StudiesAbout usBlogContact
ENPL
GAIAA, Intelligence, engineered

Your signals, systems and constraints become the starting point for AI that can work in the real world.

Solutions overviewIndustriesCase StudiesAbout usBlogContact

Bring a process, signal or recurring decision.

Start the conversation
GAIAA sp. z o.o. sp.k.
ul. Sofoklesa 17
60-461 Poznań, Poland
NIP: 7811993317
KRS: 0000777888
© 2026 GAIAAPrivacy policyhello@gaiaa.eu+48 666 308 008LinkedIn
ENPL

Case study: Enterprise operations

Natural language is useful when its SAP authority has clear boundaries.

An LLM layer turned natural-language requests into validated, permission-aware SAP actions.

SystemOutcomesRelated workDiscuss your case

System

The project and the problem

The existing SAP platform already contained the required business functions, but non-specialist users needed substantial SAP knowledge to find them, supply the correct parameters, follow the required sequence and interpret failures. An LLM layer could make SAP easier to use through natural-language requests, but unrestricted SAP access could bypass business rules and permission boundaries.

How the process worked

GAIAA built an LLM layer over SAP that translated intent into structured SAP parameters and selected only predefined, authorized SAP tools. It validated each SAP response and, when an operation failed, could inspect approved SAP dependencies and explain the recovery path rather than claiming success or exposing a raw error.

Controlled execution

How does a natural-language request become a controlled SAP action?

Use the controls below to inspect the key stages, constraints and validation decisions in that process.

SAP Operations Copilot

Environment
PROD
Actor
A. Rivera · Operations Analyst
System
SAP
Audit
◇ On

Requests

Request

Close SAP sales order SO-1842.

Close one sales order after checking its dependencies.

!BLOCKED BEFORE EXECUTION

SO-1842 cannot be closed while dependency D-14 is open.

No changes made.
Source recordSO-1842 · version 38SAP live · 10:42 CET
Execution trace

TR-260830-117

SO-1842 · version 38
Scope
SO-1842 · version 38
Access
orders.read
Tool
check_close_eligibility v2.4
Source
SAP live · 10:42 CET
Side effects
0 writes
Verification
Skipped
Source facts
Order state
SO-1842 · OPEN
Blocking dependency
D-14 · OPEN
Write calls
0

Outcomes

Operating constraints

  1. Explicit SAP permissions
  2. Defined SAP tools only
  3. Expected SAP failure handling
  4. Human-readable SAP explanations

What changed?

  1. Natural-language access to approved SAP functions
  2. Visible SAP execution traces
  3. Controlled SAP recovery
  4. SAP permission boundaries remain explicit

Evidence retained: The execution trace recorded interpreted intent, SAP authorization, SAP tool input, SAP response and recovery decisions.

Related work

SolutionPrivate AI infrastructureSolutionExisting AI optimization

Discuss your case

Have a similar operating problem? Share the environment, constraint and result you need. We can discuss the engineering path without exposing confidential details.

Discuss a similar challenge